A Little Bit of Comedy


(note: when you study philosophy, critically, you can critically think)
Feel free to share this on social media

You’re welcome and you can all thank me later


                                                              [Epic] Levels of ‘Woke’
“Basic bitch” level               
Level -1 [modern western/American logic] Keep your mind occupied and do not think just focus on work and go out and make more money [to survive].
Level 0- Freedom Caucus/Tea Party [philosophy/ logic]: status quo (i.e. Bush made an honest mistake when he invaded Iraq).
Level - Denial, projection, obfuscate, make excuses [logic]: “ Trump is going to make a great president because he is a strong businessman and did not delete vital emails like Clinton.”
Level - Republicans [logic]: basic talking points- Saddam was a bad guy so America had to be the world police and take him out.
--------------------------
“I hate SJWs” Level
Level 3- Centrist [logic]: ‘We need unregulated markets so everyone can be free to have opportunities and make more money.’
Level - Libertarianism [logic]: corporations help to employ people and Capitalism has rescued many people from poverty through decades.
Level- Libertarianism 1.02 [logic]: “Well, why don’t you just go to Cuba if you hate America so much and love Socialism?!”
Level Libertarianism [logic]: “Yes, but have you read Ayn Rand?”
------------------
“Jordan Peterson and Steven Crowder” level
Level- Libertarianism [logic]: “Give a man a fish…”
Level - Libertarianism [logic]: Governments do everything bad and are inefficient.
Level- Crowder Libertarianism: “US is the greatest country in the world- change my mind.”
Level- woke 0.1 [logic]: give people free services, food, products, business, etc so they give good reviews online and tell friends, come back to your business.
Level- woke 0.12: We need to hold the people who are in charge accountable.
-----------------
The “I’m not a Starbucks barista, I only drink coffee at the local hipster place” level
Level - woke 1.0: Historically a talking point is that ‘when humans had to survive they had to focus on survival, not abstract philosophical matters such as metaphysics.’ Counterpoint: ‘so today we have free markets where profit trumps people and corporations are people? In the old days, people focused on collectivistic cultures and civilizations were not selfish. Tell me more about Capitalism.’
Level woke 1.012: It might not be a good thing to have money in politics but super corporations would never let that happen for obvious reasons.
Level 2.0: America occupies countries and do not fight for freedom. For decades they have been taking resources from countries and exploiting poor people in their own country and abroad.  
Level 2.4 the right-wing and left-wing are both wings that are part of the same bird. Both wings are the same party- the party is called “the party of money”.
Level 3.5: Free markets are fine and dandy, crony Capitalism must be re named “vulture” Capitalism and is not okay.
Level 4.8: Sensationalism is not real every construct is to promote some product for advertising purposes
----------------------
“Drop mic” [level]
Level - woke 1.1: How about people who are able to study physics, study phenomena of the universe and real mathematicians work on new foundations of maths.
Level - woke 2.0: We need to dismantle forms of institutionalized, formal education because bureaucratic politics that are arguably inevitable in any human system is a huge waste of time.
Level- woke 2.2: How about governments do not need to either be ‘hands off’ or ‘authoritarian’? There are other alternatives that exist in between
Level – woke 17.9: Many scholars have warned us about reality (e.g. ‘business’ is the only party of America. Most people have notlistened for numerous reasons (i.e. they have not wanted to come to terms with truth, because truth is often painful. Most people have seen authorities in academia as people who are stuck up and people who should not be respected. The great irony is that people who think are the only serious people and humankind will rely on them for the future of the species, planet, and potentially, the universe)..
--------------------
New Post-Quantum, ‘How far down the Rabbit-Hole Do You Want To G0?’ also known as [the “Super Woke” or “Three Blind Mice”] level
Level too woke: If existentialism means nothing then what about studying determinism, ER vs EPR and the implications for Gödelian logic?

Level too woke: Self- consistent, closed finite systems could reveal that certain para-psychological phenomena are “real” and studying phenomenological phenomena such as the solution to the “hard problem” must be studied in depth. We are not sure if consciousness is “real” and if there is a “hard problem”. We should be able to dedicate time to studying abstract ideas without having to worry about pandering for money to survive let alone thrive.

Level too woke: Fox News and media at large might be some CIA project. However, perhaps we must use [non esoteric] meditation to relax and not allow the agenda of any wing to anger us. Although we [humans] realise that politics used to be a serious endevour, we do not take the bait and we recognise that the ploy of borders and [real] propaganda only intentionally divides and is used (and has been used) to conquer. Hence, faith must be justified. Philosophy has been dead.

Level too woke: We can define “belief” and “trust” however can one quantize an abstraction (i.e. a thought or emotion as information)?

Level too woke: We need to re-examine the contents of mind (e.g. Freudian subconscious). 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

On Competence

      On Competence In the past I have heard one proclaim that modern society is based off of some hierarchy of competence. The proposed idea seems straightforward and quite intuitive. In this post, I would like to contest the conjecture. Albeit I think that, perhaps there may be some validity to the proposition. I would like to make the proclamation that I am not opposed to the idea and think that competence mixed with ‘healthy’ competition is a positive thing. When anyone is given an equal opportunity to display his/her competence then a society shall be worthwhile and have something of value to a finite planet.   I would like to state that as foolish as theism is I deem so called ‘scholars’ such as Jordan Peterson as apart of (what has been coined) the “Intellectual Dark Web” in a new movement that has been spreading. One point (of many) that is brought up by this ‘friend’ that the Nazis were so successful due to the swift and eff...
Read more

A Response to Tom Bartlett’s “Has Consciousness Lost Its Mind?”

        A Response to Tom Bartlett’s “Has Consciousness Lost Its Mind?” On June 6, 2018 Thomas Bartlett wrote an article for The Chronicle cleverly and ironically titled “Has Consciousness Lost Its Mind?” the expanded title is a bit more extensive (and does not really roll off the tongue) “ What would Noam Chomsky, Deepak Chopra, a very friendly robot, plus a bevy of scientists, mystics, and wannabe scholars do at a fancy resort in Arizona? Perhaps real harm to the field of consciousness studies, for one thing. ” The article is an attempt to showcase the absurd, circus-like show of a conference that pretends to be serious. The Conference held in Tucson, Arizona biannually, The Science of Consciousness is spreading misinformation thanks to a bunch of ammatuer scholars, many of whom have their own theories for contending theories for some all encompassing ‘theory of everything’. These amateurs are deluded that they shall, one ...
Read more

New Intellectualism

     It used to be the case that outside of the world of academia there was seldom serious work done in realms such as physics, biology, chemistry, and mathematics.For a large majority of time, realms such as mathematics and physics have been reserved and exclusively been explored by professional scientists. Through the past several decades it seems as though there have been many others (whom are, at times involved in other professional affairs) that have decided to pursue their hobbies. In part, due to the age of the internet and other technologies, information is widely accessible.     Problems such as the "measurement problem", "the mind-body problem" and the "hard problem of consciousness" (Chalmers, 1995) are no longer issues that can only be worked on by professional scholars. The above mentioned allows for a professional academic's worst nightmare- crackpots. Unfortunately, the past several decades have given rise to both pseudo-intellectuali...
Read more